miércoles, 30 de enero de 2019

Aramoix and the goals against

Aramoix and the goals against
 Betting to lose or goal against define the content of this article, when for example in a football team one of the strikers insists on producing auto attacks for revealing to the opposing eleven the tactics and strategies that will be used in the match by his own eleven and leaves his team exposed to lose.
Keep in mind that the strategy is the complement of the tactic, that is, how the players are going to move or how they will react to specific situations. This is a dynamic concept that encompasses individual, collective movements and game philosophy.
Aramoix, is a fictitious player who having been named forward for his alleged loyalty to the team, instead works underground in reverse, to annul the defender and midfielder themselves, so that it can affect the strategies and tactics of the goalkeeper to whom he belongs and get the ball to score goals against his own team.
Aramoix pretends to respect the rules of the game, when in reality he violates them in low profile and even recklessly in public justifying himself sinisterly, above all the rules of honor and trust received and consequently mocks the technical director, betting on his dismissal because it is him who is directly responsible for the results of the game.
The undercover enemy is Aramoix, an evil being who instead of betting on the efforts of his team, on the contrary, designs the way and manner of remaining in the eleventh to sabotage it from within, seeking its implosion.
It is different to lose the game because the opponent on the other side has prepared better, but when we see that the strategies and tactics are developed by the opponent, that makes us think about the flight of information. It is when the presumed chance makes us reflect on the presence of a spy.
There is a depraved indifference to honor and loyalty, a manifest intention to ignore the coach, striving to turn deliberately and with deliberate intent, all when it benefits the team itself, placing on a silver platter on the contrary the strategies and tactics for that he wins once his
defense or offense is in the hands of the opponent.
Certainly when we do not find a rational explanation for certain behaviors, the answer is: sex, money or drugs. One of these three factors obeys the behavior of Aramoix.
How many Aramoix do you know in any scenario of life?

Aramoix y los goles en contra

 Apostar a perder o gol en contra definen el contenido de este artículo, cuando por ejemplo en un equipo de fútbol uno de los delanteros se empeña en producir auto ataques por revelar a la oncena contraria las tácticas y las estrategias que serán empleadas en el partido por su propia oncena y deja a su mismo equipo expuesto para perder.
Tengamos presente que la estrategia es el complemento de la táctica, es decir cómo se van a mover los jugadores o cómo van a reaccionar ante unas situaciones específicas. Este es un concepto dinámico que engloba los movimientos individuales, colectivos y la filosofía de juego.
Aramoix, es un jugador ficticio que habiendo sido nombrado delantero por su presunta lealtad al equipo, en cambio trabaja subterráneamente al revés, para anular al defensa y al centrocampista propios, de modo que pueda afectar las estrategias y las tácticas del guardameta al que pertenece y lograr que el balón marque goles en contra de su propia cuadrilla.
Aramoix aparenta respetar las reglas de juego, cuando en realidad las viola de bajo perfil y hasta temerariamente en público justificándose siniestramente de ello, sobre todo las reglas del honor y de la confianza recibidas y en consecuencia se burla del director técnico, apostando a su destitución porque es a él a quien se le hace responsable directo de los resultados del juego.
El enemigo encubierto es Aramoix, un ser malvado que en vez de apostar a los esfuerzos de su equipo, por el contrario diseña la forma y manera de permanecer en la oncena para sabotearla desde adentro, buscando su implosión.
Distinto es perder el partido porque la oncena contraria en buena lid se haya preparado mejor, pero cuando vemos que las estrategias y las tácticas propias son desarrolladas por el rival, eso nos hace pensar en la fuga de la información. Es cuando la presunta casualidad nos hace reflexionar sobre la presencia de un espía.
Hay una depravada indiferencia al honor y a la lealtad, una intencionalidad manifiesta por desoír al entrenador, empeñándose en voltear a propósito y con la pretensión deliberada, todo cuando beneficia al equipo propio, colocándole en bandeja de plata a la oncena contraria las estrategias y tácticas para que gane una vez que su 
defensa u ofensiva está en manos del adversario.
Ciertamente cuando no encontramos una explicación racional a ciertas conductas, la respuesta es: sexo, dinero o drogas. A uno de estos tres factores obedece el comportamiento de Aramoix.
¿Cuantos Aramoix conoces en cualquier escenario de la vida?

jueves, 11 de enero de 2018

Los dueños y los caporales…


Crisanto Gregorio León
                Paradójicamente los caporales venían de la peonada y aunque el administrador de la hacienda honestamente lo advertía,  no podía hacer mayor esfuerzo ante unos oídos sordos y ante unos ojos ciegos porque dejaron la hacienda a la disposición de unos sátrapas.
            Los dueños no entendían las razones de la destrucción de la hacienda que tantos beneficios les brindaría por años; pero no leían ni el metalenguaje, ni el contexto,  ni el texto detrás del texto, ni escuchaban consejos o por los menos esas exhortaciones no llegaban a ellos porque eran filtradas por capataces amañados y llenos de vicios que corrompían la imagen y la economía de la hacienda, bueno; eso quería creer la peonada.  Los dueños les estaban dando crédito a las personas equivocadas y la hacienda, ese patrimonio familiar  estaba siendo desbastado por muy malas personas.
Los caporales que gozaban de la confianza de los dueños habían logrado que los mejores peones se fueran de la hacienda y la gente que con pasión se entregaba a las labores  huían y la producción mermó y el prestigio de aquella tan hermosa visión familiar, se estaba yendo al precipicio porque se negaban a ver en los síntomas una gerencia oscura de gente que solo los halagaba pero que no administraban con criterios científicos ni gerenciales, sino que  imponían sus caprichosas sin razones llenas de mezquindad obedeciendo a roscas constituidas y gente infiltrada que hacia negocios ilícitos dentro de los negocios lícitos de la empresa familiar para beneficio de grupúsculos y en desmedro de la finca.
Los amiguetes se llevaban las mejores horas de trabajo y se adjudicaban las mejores faenas, mientras que a los que advertían a los dueños de la mala gestión de los capataces  de la hacienda, a esos los desmejoraban de tal forma en el trabajo para que  se fueran y no lograran advertir a los dueños de la forma en estaba siendo destruida  la hacienda y maltratada la  peonada. Pero los resultados estaban a la vista y no hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver.
Era como el amo de una casa que maltrataba a sus habitantes y después que se quedaba desolada el dueño quería achacarle las culpas a los vecinos y a factores externos exclusivamente sin aceptar que la hacienda estaba siendo destruida desde adentro por algunos de sus capataces.
Todo era un ropaje aparente para dar visos de eficiencia, pero eran los resultados en la economía de la hacienda los que les estaban dando a los dueños los indicadores de la mala gestión de los capataces y caporales. Pero los dueños no querían entender y ni siquiera aceptar ni mucho menos imaginar que por sus desacertadas decisiones, quienes regentaban la hacienda  habían apostado a que esta perdiera  a sus mejores clientes, a sus mejores trabajadores y habían logrado maquiavélicamente la disminución  de los ingresos del patrimonio familiar a tal punto que hasta por haberse fracturado la economía de la finca tuvieron que suprimir esos alegres festejos que en otros tiempos daban a su peonada.
            Habían puesto los dueños su mayor patrimonio en gente con doblez que ni siquiera aplicaba en provecho de la hacienda lo que habían aprendido en años de preparación para esos fines. Lo que privaba en los caporales eran sus propios caprichos , los intereses de una rosca y de un grupo y sus sectarias visiones de sus petulantes imágenes, llenas de jactancia y prepotencia y con una fingida humillad ante los dueños gerencian la hacienda con pavoneos ,  mientras los peones que tenían el conocimiento para mantener la producción y conservar a los clientes,  para generar provechosas ganancias a la hacienda, esos peones estaban siendo vapuleados y no les quedaba opción que irse porque no eran escuchados. Y solo una rosca maligna controlaba la hacienda haciéndola pedazos,  mientras los que realmente tenían el conocimiento y las habilidades en los asuntos del agro y la ganadería al ver que ni a los dueños les dolía la pérdida de su patrimonio, no había nada más que hacer.  

crissantogleon@gmail.com
Abogado- escritor.

lunes, 1 de enero de 2018

The septenio ...

The septenio ...
Crisanto Gregorio León

            When Joseph was asked to interpret Pharaoh's famous dream, in which seven ugly and skinny cows devour seven fat and beautiful cows, he predicted seven years of abundance, followed by seven years of famine, for which he recommended stockpile goods during good years.
            However, the story that follows very little of the interpretation that Joseph warned the pharaoh, in a balance between gratitude and complaint, came out winning the complaint and ungratefulness is what reigns in the heart and mind of our actress.
It happened that for a septenio a man had been in charge of studies, food, clothing, transport, recreation and spiritual support of a young woman who had seduced him with his innocent and harmless appearance, which made use of the female tricks to capture the unwary. This man endured even her imbalances, her bad habits, her lies and even ignored the reputation that preceded her as a nympho who starred in outrageous orgies wherever she went. A young woman of humble origin but with a proud personality who forgot how technology captured her exploits.
She had been designed by hand, in the art of pretending, in the cunning of cheating and in the ruse to manipulate. She knew of the public power that flowed from her gentle and sweet appearance, but in the private she was vulgar and rude, pedantic and boastful, which clashed with her figure and appearance of white bonitura. Something like Satan disguised as Lucifer, where the angel precedes the devil but devil and angel are one. A sly young woman whose debaucheries were an open secret, but he accepted her, educated her, guided her and became more his father than his husband.
But it was a broken pot, nothing of the good that was thrown in it germinated, because its box of values ​​was born altered and its environment strengthened its spiritual and behavioral deformations.
It filtered through decent, good-hearted people and it went unnoticed that it had such a lost personality.
Already graduated in the university, this man was not useful to him and it left it. Then it happened on an old night that he was in hospital bed seriously ill and she left him to his fate and mocked him. As by the grace of God this man recovered and the unwary continued with her, until another old night in which he asked for food because he had been three days without food and decompensated, with a bitter pain suffered by his soul for the departure of his young woman and as it was his habit to feed her, he thought that the young woman would do it with pleasure and like someone who serves another with respect and gratitude, but she brusque, rude, haughty and ruthlessly answered him with an interrogation. What do you want? keep up?
For she argued to leave exposed to his fate to that man who took advantage for seven years. Yes, you say you fed me but you did not take me to more fancy restaurants, you said I had dressed but I wanted designer clothes, you said to have transported me but I wanted you to do it in a hummer and also wanted it for me, you say I walked but the walks were not enough I wanted to travel the world, if you say you gave me spiritual encouragement but you had to put up with my deceptions and my insults and my infidelities and say you have graduated but I wanted the most expensive university and the last generation phones and she cursed him. In that sense, the unjust complaints were greater than the acknowledgments, seeing her always the glass half empty and without praising the good that she received from that man.
And God returned to the young woman her own curse, which for seven years has to suffer great health breakdowns and terrible miseries will fall on her until she purges her wicked heart and her ungratefulness. And so it is fulfilled.

crissantogleon@gmail.com
Writer.

lunes, 18 de diciembre de 2017

If you let yourself kick, I give you a crust of bread ...
Crisanto Gregorio León

                It is so alarming the rascality of some people, who do not meditate on those times where others favored them, when they did not have and others satiated their hunger and thirst. Nor do they meditate that things could be turned upside down and that what they never thanked and what they now do can turn against them and also pale their body and soul in the face of the vain, merciless, ruthless and cruel behavior with which they treat their fellow men. , life could pass bills when they think they are under the protection of a shield of money and comforts.
                Some people have never suffered shortages or precariousness and their behavior towards their peers is sidelong because without having tasted the pain of hunger and need, nor the breakdown of poverty, they believe that it is a world that does not exist because they do not know it. And I do not want to justify them if they behave with their fellow men in an arrogant way when they make a charity.
                But there are those who know what hunger and poverty are and when they raise their economies and feel prosperity winds, they become haughty, vain and cruel towards others and even against those who at some point held out their hands because they They found themselves in a better position.
                The life lady or lady vanity, has many colors and many shades, are infinite nuances, worry that the day will come, in which you will feel the crunch of your stomach as if a sharp blade broke your insides when someone conditioned two grains of rice and a strand of meat as long as you submit submission.
                It seems an expression of some defective, evil or malignant gene that makes people forgetful, when they received with love the food that satisfied their hunger and feel elevated by a promise of a better life, then they give the toupee to humiliate and kick in the stomach to those who held out their hands. But no, the evil in their hearts does not come from the shortage or better bonanza, no, the evil of their hearts seems to be a legacy, a cursed inheritance that does not allow them to see in others a being with affections and feelings, they believe that others do not have human sensibility, because they are the only sentient beings to be flattered, justified and understood. The others do not, the others do not feel or suffer or wait ...
                A meal prepared in advance of all the cruelty with which it is made, with which it is served or with which it is invited, is a food that falls to the stomach like a poison, like a gall, like an insult that does not feed the body, nor It gives tranquility to the soul. It is a mouthful of insults, it is a mouthful full of hypocrisy, it is a mouthful that hurts self-esteem.
Imagine that someone conditions, for example, giving him a plate of food with the arrogance of an evil personality, whose gift is not surrender with love but boasting and haughtiness. If you are going to give a meal, do not humiliate your guest by doing and saying things that make him feel insignificant. Better get away from your food, which is preferable to be hungry than to feel in the mouth, the throat and the viscera, the sharp and sharp blades of humiliation.
                Blessed is he who gives with humility and without arrogance not only at Christmas.

sábado, 23 de septiembre de 2017

The sickly vanity, boasting and arrogance

Crisanto Gregorio León

 Excuse not demanded, manifest guilt. This aphorism is reflected in the Latin expression "Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesto". And that lawyers are so familiar to hear the clarifications that turn against their owner or owner. It exposes the guilty person when he gives explanations and arguments about what he has not been asked to clarify or about which he has not been asked for any justification.

You did it, no one asked you to give the reasons, everything was in evidence, and yet you insist on proving that you are not guilty and the affected are not interested in explaining yourself. Then why do you insist on presenting loopholes?

But there is so much evidence of your guilt that you rush impulsively to say I was not! Do not say that you are dark, as you argue the most embarras. Even the ingenuity to listen to you by force, forcing others to witness your explanations and sticking your rhetoric.

There are those who insist on giving explanations to dispel their guilt, which is flagrant. While others do not want to dissipate their guilt but to rule over their own felony, not to feel guilty of what they have done or said, because conceit and arrogance have their soul imprisoned. Guilt is not a cause of grief, but of boasting and arrogance; because there has been no fault but bad intentions. It is as if they say so, - I did it I am guilty and what? - but I do not assume guilt, on the contrary I rejoice in it.

I remember the popular songs of Spain, which were not because they were the cause of another's sorrow, but of the own guilt that the soul eats and sentenced equally the gauchos "nobody discovers his breast to give relief to his grief, that the one that his chest discovers , by his mouth is condemned. "

Only the punishments of some people are embarrassments because they feel uncovered of what they have always done low profile breaking all moral or ethical standards, social uses, religion or law, and worse still against life that charges everything sooner or later and then in the face of such an awareness of his own conscience as his play is exposed; decide to openly persecute the innocent, making them victims, arguing for an ephemeral and circumstantial power, which is only vanity and sickly position. This is the cause of those who insist on giving explanations to those who do not want to hear them and do not even ask for them. Because when you light up you get dark. And in the hands of this triumvirate, vanity, boasting and arrogance are washed conscience.

 crissantogleon@gmail.com

Columnist

La enfermiza vanidad, la jactancia y prepotencia

Crisanto Gregorio León
 Excusa no pedida, culpabilidad  manifiesta. Este aforismo es recogido en la expresión latina “Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesta”. Y que  a los abogados nos es tan familiar al escuchar los esclarecimientos que se vuelven contra su dueña o dueño. Deja al descubierto a la persona culpable cuando da explicaciones y argumentaciones respecto de lo que no se le ha pedido aclarar  o de aquello de lo que no se le  ha solicitado ninguna justificación.
Lo hiciste, nadie te ha pedido que des las razones, todo quedó en evidencia, y aún así insistes en demostrar que no eres culpable y ni los afectados  están interesados en que te expliques. ¿Entonces por qué insistes en presentar escapatorias?
Pero es tanta la evidencia de tu culpabilidad que corres impulsivamente a decir ¡yo no fui¡ No aclares que oscureces, pues a medida que arguyes más la embarras. Incluso hasta te las ingenias para que te escuchen por la fuerza, obligando a otros a presenciar tus explicaciones y calarse tu retórica.
Hay quienes insisten en dar explicaciones para disipar su culpa, la cual es flagrante. Mientras otros, no quieren disipar su culpa sino  enseñorearse en su propia felonía, por no sentirse culpables de lo que han hecho o dicho, pues el engreimiento y la soberbia les tienen encarcelada el alma.  La culpa  no le es motivo de pena, sino de jactancia y arrogancia; porque no ha habido culpa sino malas intenciones. Es como si afirmaran  así, –  yo lo hice soy culpable  ¿y qué?-, pero no asumo la culpa, por el contrario me regocijo en ella.
Recuerdo los cantos populares españoles, que no lo eran por ser motivo de pena ajena, sino de la propia culpa que carcome el alma y que sentenciaban igualmente los gauchos “nadie descubra su pecho por dar alivio a su pena, que el que su pecho descubre, por su boca se condena”.
Solo que las penas de algunas personas, son encabritamientos por sentirse descubiertas de lo que siempre han hecho bajo perfil quebrantando toda norma moral o ética , los usos sociales, la religión o el Derecho , y peor  aún en contra de la vida que todo lo cobra tarde o temprano y entonces ante tal escarmiento de su propia conciencia al quedar su juego expuesto; deciden perseguir abiertamente a inocentes , convirtiéndolos en víctimas,  argumentando una potestad efímera y circunstancial, que solo es vanidad y enfermiza posición.  He aquí la causa de quien insiste en dar explicaciones a quienes no quieren oírlas y  ni siquiera las han pedido. Porque al aclarar oscureces. Y en manos de este triunvirato , la vanidad, la jactancia y la prepotencia se lavan la conciencia.
 crissantogleon@gmail.com
Columnista